I was just recently made aware that the CBF has been working hard at an amendment for some city ordinances on cycling which will help define some legal lines that drivers & cyclists can count on. I think it’s quite reasonable from a purely safety perspective; I do not view this as a way for cyclists to get back at drivers or anything sly, but as a way to help guarantee everyone’s safety by outlining reasonable bits of understanding for cyclists and drivers. If this is passed, this will be a good way to inform drivers of reasonable expectations so they can be better educated on how to interact with cyclists on the road. This is a win for both drivers and cyclists in my book! This amendment if passed, will mandate (snipped from CBF email verbatim):
- Requiring a minimum of three feet of clearance while passing bicyclists
- Prohibiting a motorist from opening a door into moving traffic, reducing the danger of “dooring”
- Raising the fines for vehicles parked in bike lanes or marked shared lanes
- Requiring motorists to yield to oncoming bicyclists when turning left, which prevents a “left hook” crash
- Prohibiting motorists from turning right in front of a bicyclist, which prevents a “right hook” crash
- Requiring motorists to exercise due care for bicyclists in addition to pedestrians
It also outlines some fines for doing bad things as outlined here, but I think that’s just to motivate drivers and I’m not concerned with the money values. This amendment will help with some of the usual concerns that both myself and several others I’ve ridden with have had in Chicago; it can be quite worrysome cycling in the city and this is a good thing!
So, if you’re living in the city, please voice your two cents to your alderman! From my understanding, not all of them sit on the Traffic Control & Safety Committee who votes on this, but it’s still good to voice your opinion. The next meeting of the committee is quite soon – Wednesday March 5th at 9 AM. If you support this amendment, please make yourself heard to make cycling in the city a safer place!
Feel free to check out a copy of the email going around about this.
So, let me verify this.
In your development country :), today,
1. it is allowed for motorists (only?) to open a door into moving traffic
2. motorists are not required to yield to oncoming bicyclists (only?) when turning left
3. it is allowed (required?) for motorists to turn right in front of a bicyclist
This strikes me as rather odd.
I think most countries with any traffic regulations will have a ‘catch-all’ or ‘wild-card’ clause that prohibits all of these anyway. It’s like saying, that it is such good news that as-of-now it is also prohibited to kill your neigbour using an unsharpened knife
If the state of affairs really is that bad, I do think this is a good amendment, but please let’s endeavour to make this thing a bit more generic. Right now I’m inclined to jump the bandwagon and add a few more obvious improvements:
– prohibit motorists from manouvering their vehicles in the same location as a cyclist who at the same time takes part of traffic in normal fashion
– prohibit mototists from causing a cyclist to be physically elevated by making contact with the front or rear of the vehicle, unless that cyclist has given prior written permission to do the same
You get my drift
Oh, and in case you’re wondering why I’m such a stuck-up a-h about this all: I’m from Holland!
Cheers